中年人移位型股骨颈骨折内固定与关节置换的疗效比较
摘要点击次数: 1807   全文下载次数: 757   投稿时间:2023-01-08    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
王志远 WANG Zhi-yuan 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
罗璠 LUO Fan 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
张英琪 ZHANG Ying-qi 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
刘嘉 LIU Jia 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
祝晓忠 ZHU Xiao-zhong 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China  
饶志涛 RAO Zhi-tao 同济大学附属同济医院骨科, 上海 200065 Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China raozht1980@163.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2023年,第36卷,第3期,第232-235页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.03.007
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:分析比较年龄55~65岁中年人股骨颈移位型骨折内固定与关节置换的临床疗效。

方法:2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 8 月收治 Garden Ⅲ型或Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折患者 86例,根据手术方式的不同将其分为两组。其中38例采用平行拉力螺钉内固定治疗(内固定组),男 26 例,女12例,年龄55~64(60.2±3.1)岁;48例进行全髋关节置换术(关节置换组),男28 例,女20例,年龄57~65(61.3±3.8)岁。受伤至手术时间 1~3 d。比较两组患者的再手术率,深部感染发生率,髋关节功能Harris评分,疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),患者主观报告功能评分采用欧洲五维健康量表(European five-dimensional Health Questionnaire,EQ-5D)。

结果:所有患者获得随访,时间 24~54(35.8±10.3)个月。平行拉力螺钉内固定组术后再手术率高于较全髋关节置换术组(P<0.05)。两组患者深部感染发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后12个月时髋关节Harris评分及VAS比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。平行拉力螺钉内固定组术后患者主观报告的功能评分EQ-5D低于全髋关节置换术组(P<0.05)。

结论:中年人股骨颈移位型骨折内固定与关节置换的中短期疗效相似,但全髋关节置换术后再手术率低,患者主观报告的功能评分较高。
【关键词】股骨颈骨折  内固定  全髋关节置换术
 
Comparison of effect between internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in middle age patients
ABSTRACT  

Objective To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture from 55 to 65 years.

Methods From September 2016 to August 2020,86 patients with Garden type Ⅲ or Ⅳ femoral neck fracture were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods. Among them,38 patients were treated with lag screws for internal fixation,there were 26 males and 12 females,aged 55 to 64 years old with an average of(60.2±3.1) years;the other 48 patients were treated with total hip replacement,including 28 males and 20 females,aged from 57 to 65 years old with an average of(61.3±3.8) years. The time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 3 days. The reoperation rate,incidence of deep infection,Harris score of hip joint function,visual analogue scale(VAS) of pain and patients reported outcome scores(European five-dimensional Health Questionnaire,EQ-5D) were compared between two groups.

Results All patients were followed up for 24 to 54 months with an average of (35.8±10.3) months. There was significant difference in reoperation rate between two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on the incidence of deep infection,hip Harris score and VAS between two groups(P>0.05). The postoperative EQ-5D score of patients with internal fixation was lower than that of total hip replacement,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusion Both the surgery of internal fixation and total hip replacement have similar effect in short-and medium term among the patients aged 55 to 65 years old. However,for the reoperation rate,the group of internal fixation was higher than that of total hip replacement. For the subjective functional score of patients,the group of internal fixation was lower than that of total hip replacement.
KEY WORDS  Femoral neck fracture  Internal fixation  Total hip replacement
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:王志远,罗璠,张英琪,刘嘉,祝晓忠,饶志涛.中年人移位型股骨颈骨折内固定与关节置换的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(3):232~235
英文格式:WANG Zhi-yuan,LUO Fan,ZHANG Ying-qi,LIU Jia,ZHU Xiao-zhong,RAO Zhi-tao.Comparison of effect between internal fixation and total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in middle age patients[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2023,36(3):232~235
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号