F形空心钉与传统3枚平行钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较
摘要点击次数: 1457   全文下载次数: 341   投稿时间:2021-09-24    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
程文静 CHENG Wen-jing 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院创伤骨科, 安徽 芜湖 241000 Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China  
丁国正 DING Guo-zheng 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院创伤骨科, 安徽 芜湖 241000 Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China dingguozheng0039@163.com 
谢家兵 XIE Jia-bing 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院创伤骨科, 安徽 芜湖 241000 Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China  
李天霖 LI Tian-lin 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院创伤骨科, 安徽 芜湖 241000 Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China  
张扬 ZHANG Yang 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院创伤骨科, 安徽 芜湖 241000 Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China  
龚延海 GONG Yan-hai 皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院创伤骨科, 安徽 芜湖 241000 Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2022年,第35卷,第7期,第678-682页
DOI:10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.07.016
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:分析比较"F"形空心钉与传统倒三角3枚平行螺钉内固定治疗青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。

方法:2017年1月至2020年1月收治Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折患者38例,根据置入钉方式的不同将其分为两组,其中A组18例,采用"F"形空心钉固定,男12例,女6例,年龄37~55岁,受伤至手术时间1~3 d。B组20例,采用传统倒三角3枚平行拉力螺钉固定,男12例,女8例,年龄35~55岁,受伤至手术时间为1~3 d。比较两组患者骨折不愈合,股骨头坏死,股骨颈短缩,空心螺钉退出情况,髋关节功能Harris评分,疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)。

结果:所有患者获得随访,时间为15~31个月。两组患者在骨折不愈合,股骨颈短缩,股骨头坏死方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者在螺钉退出方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后12个月时髋关节Harris评分及VAS评分差异均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论:"F"形与传统倒三角3枚平行空心钉内固定治疗青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折中短期疗效相似,但"F"形空心钉退钉率较低。
【关键词】股骨颈骨折  骨折固定术,内  骨钉
 
Comparison of curative effect between F-shaped hollow screw and traditional three parallel screws in the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of F-shaped hollow screw and traditional inverted triangle three parallel screws in the treatment of young and middle-aged Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture.

Methods: From January 2017 to January 2020, 38 patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture were treated. They were divided into two groups according to different screw placement methods. Among them, 18 patients in group A were fixed with F-shaped hollow screw, including 12 males and 6 females, aged 37 to 55 years, the time from injury to operation was 1 to 3 days. Other 20 cases in group B were fixed with 3 parallel screws in traditional inverted triangle, including 12 males and 8 females, aged 35 to 55 years. The time from injury to operation was 1 to 3 days. The fracture nonunion, femoral head necrosis, femoral neck shortening, hollow screw withdrawal, hip function Harris score and visual analogue scale(VAS) of pain were compared between the two groups.

Results: All patients were followed up for 15 to 31 months. There was no significant difference in fracture nonunion, femoral neck shortening and femoral head necrosis between two groups(P>0.05). There was significant difference in screw withdrawal between two groups(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hip Harris score and VAS between the two groups at 12 months after operation(P>0.05).

Conclusion: The short-term and medium-term effects of F-shaped and traditional inverted triangle three parallel screws in the treatment of young and middle-aged Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures are similar, but the nail withdrawal rate of F-shaped hollow screw is low.
KEY WORDS  Femoral neck fracture  Fracture fixation, internal  Bone nails
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:程文静,丁国正,谢家兵,李天霖,张扬,龚延海.F形空心钉与传统3枚平行钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2022,35(7):678~682
英文格式:CHENG Wen-jing,DING Guo-zheng,XIE Jia-bing,LI Tian-lin,ZHANG Yang,GONG Yan-hai.Comparison of curative effect between F-shaped hollow screw and traditional three parallel screws in the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2022,35(7):678~682
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号