| 腕管镜和关节镜治疗跖筋膜病的病例对照研究 |
|
摘要点击次数: 1180
全文下载次数: 429
投稿时间：2021-06-22
|
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2022年，第35卷，第6期，第538-542页 |
| DOI：10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.06.007 |
| 基金项目:湖州市科技局公益性研究项目(编号:2020GYB26) |
|
中文摘要:
目的:探讨腕管镜系统在保守治疗效果不佳的跖筋膜病患者微创手术治疗中的疗效。
方法:自2018年8月至2019年8月收治跖筋膜炎患者50例,按照手术方法不同分为两组,每组25例。腕管镜组男11例,女14例;年龄39~67(57.7±6.4)岁;采用腕管镜系统行微创跖筋膜松解。关节镜组男9例,女16例;年龄41~73(58.1±7.2)岁;采用传统4.0 mm关节镜器械行微创跖筋膜松解。观察并比较两组患者手术时间、住院费用及术后并发症情况,术后12个月采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及美国足踝骨科协会(American Orthopedic Foot Ankle Society,AOFAS)评分进行功能评价。
结果:50例患者均获得随访,时间12~18(14.3±2.1)个月。两组患者手术时间、住院费用比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腕管镜组患者手术切口均顺利愈合,关节镜组患者2例手术切口存在延迟愈合,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腕管镜组术后12个月VAS、AOFAS评分及分级与关节镜组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
结论:腕管镜系统与传统关节镜治疗跖筋膜病的临床效果相当,但采用腕管镜系统无须术中灌注,对软组织保护更好,手术时间更短,住院费用更低。 |
| 【关键词】关节镜|筋膜炎|病例对照研究 |
| |
| Case-control study on carpal canal endoscopy and arthroscopy for the treatment of plantar fasciopathy |
|
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore clinical effects of carpal canal endoscopy in treating patients with plantar fasciopathy who failed by conservative treatment.
Methods: From August 2018 to August 2019,50 patients with plantar fascia were divided into two groups and 25 patients in each group. In carpal canal endoscopy group,included 11 males and 14 females,aged from 39 to 67 years old with an average of(57.7±6.4) years old;carpal canal endoscopy was used to plantar fascia release. In arthroscopy group,included 9 males and 16 females,aged from 41 to 73 years old with an average of (58.1±7.2) years old;conventional 4.0 mm arthroscopy Instruments was used to plantar fascia release. Operation time,hospitalization expense and postoperative complications between two groups were observed and compared. Postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS) and American Orthopedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were used to evaluate clinical function.
Results: All patients were followed up from 12 to 18 months with an average of (14.3±2.1) months. There were significant differentces in operation time and hospitalization expense between two groups (P<0.05). Surgical incision healed well in carpal canal endoscopy group,and 2 patients delayed union in arthroscopy group,and no difference between two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in VAS,AOFAS and grading between two groups at 12 months after operation(P>0.05).
Conclusion: The outcome of carpal canal endoscopy and arthroscopy has similar effects in treating plantar fascia. While carpal canal endoscopy has advantages of need not perfusion during opertaion,protect soft tissue well,less operation time,and lower cost. |
| KEY WORDS Arthroscopes|Fasciitis|Case-control studies |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 潘乐,陈建强,陈闵昌,朱红夷,武中庆,张占丰.腕管镜和关节镜治疗跖筋膜病的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2022,35(6):538~542 |
| 英文格式: | PAN Le,CHEN Jian-qiang,CHEN Min-chang,ZHU Hong-yi,WU Zhong-qing,ZHANG Zhan-feng.Case-control study on carpal canal endoscopy and arthroscopy for the treatment of plantar fasciopathy[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2022,35(6):538~542 |
|
| 阅读全文 下载 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
