骨形态发生蛋白治疗开放性胫骨骨折的Meta分析
摘要点击次数: 2484   全文下载次数: 1120   投稿时间:2012-05-23    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
魏攀登 WEI Pan-deng 兰州大学第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000  
曹立颖 CAO Li-ying 兰州大学第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000  
丁明聪 DING Ming-cong 兰州大学第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000  
陈志信 CHEN Zhi-xin 甘肃省人民医院骨一科,甘肃 兰州 730000 The First Department of Orthopaedics,the People's Hospital of Gansu,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu,China zhixinchen2008@126.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2012年,第25卷,第11期,第946-950页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2012.11.017
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:系统评价骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)治疗开放性胫骨骨折的疗效.

方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库和维普数据库,并手工检索相关领域杂志.检索不受语种限制,时间均从建库至2012年4月,收集骨形态发生蛋白治疗开放性胫骨骨折的所有随机对照试验.根据Cochrane协作网推荐的“风险评估工具”进行偏倚风险评估,用RevMan 5.1 软件进行统计学分析.

结果:最终纳入3个随机对照试验,共851例患者.研究结果显示:和对照组相比,BMP治疗开放性胫骨骨折未提高其骨折愈合率[RR=1.16,95%CI(0.95,1.41),P=0.15],但是可减少二次干预发生情况[RR=0.72,95%CI(0.58,0.89),P=0.003];在不良事件发生率方面,BMP治疗开放性胫骨骨折后发生感染[RR=1.31,95%CI(0.94,1.81),P=0.11]和疼痛的不良事件[RR=0.92,95%CI(0.79,1.08),P=0.30]与对照组差异无统计学意义.

结论:骨形态发生蛋白治疗开放性胫骨骨折有一定的效果.由于纳入研究质量和病例数量的局限,上述结论尚需要更多高质量的随机对照试验进一步验证.
【关键词】骨形态发生蛋白  胫骨  骨折  Meta分析
 
A meta-analysis of bone morphogenetic protein for the treatment of open tibial fractures
ABSTRACT  

Objective:To systematically assess the clinical efficacy of bone morphogenetic proteins in the treatment of open tibial fractures.

Methods:Based on the principles and methods of Cochrane systematic reviews,the Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMBASE,Chinese Bio-medicine Database,China Journal Full-text Database,VIP database were searched from their establishment to April 2012 in whatever language. Related journals were handsearched as well. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bone morphogenetic protein for the treatment of open tibial fractures were included. The quality of the included trials according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version was assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.1 was used for meta-analysis.

Results:Three RCTs totaling 851 patients were included. The results showed that bone morphogenetic protein had no significant differences in fracture healing [RR=1.16,95%CI(0.95,1.41),P=0.15],but lower secondary interventions incidence rate[RR=0.72,95%CI(0.58,0.89),P=0.003]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of adverse events of infection [RR=1.31,95%CI(0.94,1.81),P=0.11] and pain[RR=0.92,95%CI(0.79,1.08),P=0.30].

Conclusion:Bone morphogenetic protein has certain advantages in treating open tibial fractures. It needs more high-quality articles to assess the long-term effect of different courses of treatments. The above conclusion still needs more high-quality randomized controlled trails to be verified owing to the limitations of the number and quality of systematic review included studies.
KEY WORDS  Bone morphogenetic protein  Tibial  Fractures  Meta-analysis
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:魏攀登,曹立颖,丁明聪,陈志信.骨形态发生蛋白治疗开放性胫骨骨折的Meta分析[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(11):946~950
英文格式:WEI Pan-deng,CAO Li-ying,DING Ming-cong,CHEN Zhi-xin.A meta-analysis of bone morphogenetic protein for the treatment of open tibial fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2012,25(11):946~950
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号