正骨手法与中药熏洗治疗陈旧性踝关节扭伤的病例对照研究
摘要点击次数: 2676   全文下载次数: 427   投稿时间:2011-09-05    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
李俊海 LI Jun-hai 北京中医药大学第三附属医院骨科,北京 100029 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China ljy621229@sina.com 
王庆甫 WANG Qing-fu 北京中医药大学第三附属医院骨科,北京 100029 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China  
黄沪 HUANG Hu 北京中医药大学第三附属医院骨科,北京 100029 Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2012年,第25卷,第2期,第113-115页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2012.02.008
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:比较正骨手法与中药熏洗治疗陈旧性踝关节扭伤的临床效果。

方法:2008年3月至2011年5月,将76例患者分为治疗组39例和对照组37例。治疗组:男 15例,女 24 例;年龄20~59岁,平均(42.97±9.21)岁;病程1~60个月;踝关节功能评分平均(71.27±4.50)分。对照组:男 11例,女 26 例;年龄25~57岁,平均(41.29±8.77)岁;病程1~36个月,平均(8.47±7.37)个月;踝关节功能评分平均(71.45±4.61)分。治疗组采用正骨手法治疗,每周2次;对照组采用中药熏洗治疗,每日1次。采用Baird-Jackson 踝关节功能评分,3周后比较2组患者的踝关节功能评分及其治疗效果。

结果:治疗3周后,治疗组踝关节评分为(93.44±4.91)分,对照组踝关节评分为(85.81±6.57)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组评分优于对照组。治疗组治疗前后的踝关节平均分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组治疗前后的踝关节平均分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗组优16例,良18例,可3例,差2例;对照组优9例,良14例,可5例,差9例,治疗组疗效优于对照组。

结论:正骨手法与中药熏洗治疗陈旧性踝关节扭伤均有一定的疗效,且前者优于后者。
【关键词】踝关节  扭伤和劳损  正骨手法  中草药  病例对照研究
 
Case-control study on therapeutic effects between bone-setting and herbal fumigation for the treatment of the obsolete malleolus joint sprains
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To compare the clinical effects of bone-setting technique and herbal fumigation for the treatment of the obsolete malleolus joint sprains.

Methods: From March 2008 to May 2011,76 patients were divided into treatment group(39 cases) and control group(37 cases). In the treatment group:15 males and 24 females;the age ranged from 20 to 59 years with an average of(42.97±9.21)years;the course of disease ranged from 1 to 60 months;the average score of ankle joint function was(71.27±4.50). In the control group:11 males and 26 females;the age ranged from 25 to 57 years with an average of(41.29±8.77)years;the course of disease ranged from 1 to 36 months with an average of (8.47±7.37) months;the average score of ankle joint function was(71.45±4.61). The patients in the treatment group were treated with bone-setting technique two times a week,and the patients in the control group were treated with herbal fumigation once a day. The ankle joint function scores and treatment effects of the two groups were compared after 3 weeks by using Baird-Jackson ankle function score.

Results: After 3 weeks of the treatment,the average score of ankle joint function of the treatment group was(93.44±4.91),and in the control group was(85.81±6.57),the difference has statistical significance. The treatment group score was better than that of the control group. Before and after treatment,the average ankle score of the treatment group was (71.27±4.50) and (93.44±4.91),the difference has statistical significance. Before and after treatment,the average ankle score of the control group was(71.45±4.61) and(85.81±6.57),the difference has statistical significance. In the treatment group,16 cases got an excellent result,18 good,3 fair,2 poor;in the control group,9 cases got an excellent result,14 good,5 fair,9 poor. The difference has statistical significance.

Conclusion: The bone-setting techniques and herbal fumigation treatment of obsolete malleolus joint sprains both have a certain effect,and the former is better than the latter.
KEY WORDS  Ankle joint  Sprains and strains  Bone setting manipulation  Drugs,Chinese herbal  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:李俊海,王庆甫,黄沪.正骨手法与中药熏洗治疗陈旧性踝关节扭伤的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(2):113~115
英文格式:LI Jun-hai,WANG Qing-fu,HUANG Hu.Case-control study on therapeutic effects between bone-setting and herbal fumigation for the treatment of the obsolete malleolus joint sprains[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2012,25(2):113~115
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号