微创内固定系统倒置与防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗高龄复杂不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的比较
摘要点击次数: 2538   全文下载次数: 1290   投稿时间:2010-08-25    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
唐少龙 TANG Shao-long 浙江大学医学院,浙江 温岭 317500
温州医学院附属温岭医院骨科,浙江 温岭 317500
Department of Orthopaedics, Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical, Wenling 317500, Zhejiang, China  
江敞 JIANG Chang 温州医学院附属温岭医院骨科,浙江 温岭 317500 Department of Orthopaedics, Wenling Hospital, Wenzhou Medical, Wenling 317500, Zhejiang, China ty19800@sina.com 
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2011年,第24卷,第5期,第366-369页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2011.05.003
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:比较微创内固定系统(less invasive stabilization system,LISS)倒置与防旋股骨近端髓内钉(proximal femoral nail antirotation,PFNA)治疗高龄复杂不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的近期疗效,探讨内固定选择的策略。

方法:自2007年2月至2009年6月收治47例高龄复杂不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折(EvansⅣ,Ⅴ,R型)的患者;23例应用LISS倒置治疗,男7例,女16例;年龄76~97岁;24例应用PFNA治疗,男9例,女15例,年龄73~90岁。并对两组手术时间、术中出血、术中摄片次数、切口长度、住院时间、骨愈合时间、髋关节功能情况进行分析对比。

结果:所有患者获得随访,时间8~18个月,平均13.1个月。全部患者均获骨折愈合,无伤口感染、髋内翻及内固定切出等并发症。PFNA组较LISS倒置组在手术时间、切口长度等方面均略有优势,但无明显差异;按照Harris髋关节评分标准术后PFNA组和LISS倒置组相比较无明显差异。

结论:PFNA及LISS倒置治疗高龄复杂不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折近期疗效都比较理想,均为较好的内固定物。
【关键词】股骨骨折  骨折固定术,内  外科手术  老年人  临床对照试验
 
Comparison of the effect of inverted less invasive stabilization system(LISS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotafion(PFNA) in the treatment of complex unstable intertrochanteric fracture in aged
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To compare the therapeutic effectiveness of inverted less invasive stabilization system(LISS)and proximal femoral nail anlirotafion(PFNA)in treatment of complex unstable intertrochanteric fracture in aged,and to investigate the selective strategy of the internal fixation.

Methods: From February 2007 to June 2009,47 senior patients with complex and unstable intertrochanteric fractures(Evans Ⅳ,Ⅴ,R-type) were treated. Among them 23 patients were treated by inverted LISS,including 7 males and 16 females,aged from 76 to 97 years;24 patients were treated by PFNA,including 9 males and 15 females,aged from 73 to 90 years old. The mean operating time,blood loss,intraoperative photographs frequency,incision length,length of stay,bone healing,hip function were analyzed and compared.

Results: All patients were followed up for 8 to 18 months (averaged 13.1 months). All fractures got bone healing. No complications such as wound infection,varus and internal fixation cut out occurred. The operative time,incision length,in PFNA group had a slight ascendant than that in LISS inversion group,but there were no significant differences. According to postoperative Harris hip score outcome of LISS inversion group compared with the PFNA group,there was no significant difference.

Conclusion: Both of PFNA and LISS have ideal effect in treatment of complex unstable intertrochanteric fracture in aged,and are good internal fixations.
KEY WORDS  Femoral fractures  Fracture fixation,internal  Surgical procedures,operative  Aged  Controlled clinical trials
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:唐少龙,江敞.微创内固定系统倒置与防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗高龄复杂不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(5):366~369
英文格式:TANG Shao-long,JIANG Chang.Comparison of the effect of inverted less invasive stabilization system(LISS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotafion(PFNA) in the treatment of complex unstable intertrochanteric fracture in aged[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2011,24(5):366~369
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号