髌骨粉碎性骨折3种固定方式比较分析
摘要点击次数: 2052   全文下载次数: 1186   投稿时间:2010-08-22    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
于治涛 YU Zhi-tao 自贡恒博医院骨科, 四川 自贡 643000 Department of Orthopaedics, Hengbo Hospital of Zigong, Zigong 643000, Sichuan, China frddyy@163.com 
余俊东 YU Jun-dong 自贡恒博医院骨科, 四川 自贡 643000 Department of Orthopaedics, Hengbo Hospital of Zigong, Zigong 643000, Sichuan, China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2011年,第24卷,第4期,第319-321页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2011.04.015
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:通过对比髌骨粉碎性骨折不同固定方法的临床疗效, 为髌骨粉碎性骨折的治疗提供选择依据。

方法:2003年2月至2009年6月采用3种固定方式治疗56例髌骨粉碎性骨折, 其中采用克氏针钢丝固定(A组)18例, 男9例, 女9例;年龄32~52岁, 平均(47.62±4.82)岁;丝线环扎配合石膏固定(B组)13例, 男3例, 女10例;年龄38~65岁, 平均(48.58±8.28)岁;记忆合金聚髌器固定(C组)25例, 男9例, 女16例;年龄32~68岁, 平均(48.36±9.59)岁。按改良Böstman评估标准, 对3组的膝关节活动度、疼痛、行走、上楼梯等8个方面进行评分比较。

结果:所有病例获随访, 时间8~26个月, 平均15.6个月, 骨折全部愈合。A、B、C组Böstman评分的总平均分分别为(26.00±4.16)、(22.08±5.31)、(26.44±3.77)分, A、C组评分优于B组。

结论:克氏针钢丝或聚髌器固定治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折, 固定牢靠, 功能恢复佳, 疗效满意。
【关键词】髌骨  骨折,粉碎性  骨折固定术,内  石膏,外科
 
Comparison of clinical effects for three methods in treating comminuted patellar fractures
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To compare clinical effects of different fixations in order to provide the best therapeutic choice for comminuted patellar fractures.

Methods: From February 2003 to June 2009, 56 patients with comminuted patellar fractures were treated with three methods of fixation. Of them, 18 patients(group A) were treated with Kirschner-wire with steel wire fixation, there were 9 males and 9 females, ranging in age from 32 to 52 years with an average of (47.62±4.82) years;13 patients (group B) with circular silk thread fixation and plaster immobilization, there were 3 males and 10 females, ranging in age from 38 to 65 years with an average of(48.58±8.28) years;25 patients (group C) with memory alloy patella holder fixation, there were 9 males and 16 females, ranging in age from 32 to 68 years with an average of (48.36±9.59) years. According to criteria of Böstman, eight indexes were compared, including the range of motion of the knee, pain, walking and so on.

Results: All patients were followed up from 8 to 26 months with an average of 15.6 months. All the fractures healed. The Böstman scoring of group A, B, C were respectively 26.00±4.16, 22.08±5.31, 26.44±3.77. The clinical effects of group A and C were better than that of group B(P<0.05).

Conclusion: The method of Kirschner-wire with steel wire fixation or memory alloy patella holder fixation can obtain satisfactory effects in treating comminuted patellar fractures because of steady fixation and early function recovery.
KEY WORDS  Patella  Fractures, comminuted  Fractures fixation, internal  Casts, surgical
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:于治涛,余俊东.髌骨粉碎性骨折3种固定方式比较分析[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(4):319~321
英文格式:YU Zhi-tao,YU Jun-dong.Comparison of clinical effects for three methods in treating comminuted patellar fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2011,24(4):319~321
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号