锁定钢板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床对照试验
摘要点击次数: 2781   全文下载次数: 1387   投稿时间:2010-10-19    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
罗湘平 LUO Xiang-ping 耒阳市人民医院,湖南 耒阳 421800 People's Hospital of Leiyang,Leiyang 421800,Hunan,China luoxiangping8@sina.com 
何顺清 HE Shun-qing 耒阳市人民医院,湖南 耒阳 421800 People's Hospital of Leiyang,Leiyang 421800,Hunan,China  
李治安 LI Zhi-an 耒阳市人民医院,湖南 耒阳 421800 People's Hospital of Leiyang,Leiyang 421800,Hunan,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2011年,第24卷,第3期,第242-244页
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2011.03.019
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:探讨锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。

方法:回顾性分析2006年2月至2008年12月收治的108 例股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料。采用股骨近端锁定钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折51 例,男23例,女28例;年龄45~86岁,平均66.0岁;采用DHS治疗股骨粗隆间骨折57例,男26例,女31例,年龄43~81岁,平均64.1岁。观察手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、骨折临床愈合时间、术后并发症及术后髋关节功能恢复情况。术后髋关节功能按Harris评分评定。

结果:108例均获随访,时间8~24个月,平均12.5个月。锁定钢板组手术时间平均(87±14) min,术中出血量平均(367±213) ml,术后引流量平均(63±14) ml,骨折临床愈合时间平均(11.9±3.4)周,术后并发症7例,Harris评分平均(85±6)分;DHS组手术时间(115±23) min,术中出血量平均(582±243) ml,术后引流量平均(98±16) ml,骨折临床愈合时间平均(12.4±2.5)周,术后并发症9例,Harris评分平均(84±8)分。两组骨折愈合时间、术后并发症及髋关节功能恢复情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术时间、术中出血量及术后引流量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).与DHS 组相比,股骨近端锁定钢板组手术时间短、术中出血量及术后引流量少。

结论:股骨近端锁定钢板操作简单、创伤小、固定牢靠 、并发症少,是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的有效方法。
【关键词】股骨骨折  骨折固定术,内  病例对照研究
 
Case-control studies on locking plates and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures
ABSTRACT  

Objective: To explore the clinical effects of locking plates in the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Methods: From February 2006 to December 2008,108 patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with locking plate and DHS were retrospective analyzed. Fifty-one patients were treated with locking plates,including 23 males and 28 females,aged 45 to 86 years old(averaged 66.0 years old);and fifty-seven patients were treated with DHS,including 26 males and 31 females,aged 43 to 81 years old(averaged 64.1 years old). The outcome measures collected for statistical analysis on the following aspects:operative time,blood loss,drainage,healing time,complications and Harris scores.

Results: One hundred and eight patients were followed up ranging from 8 to 24 months(averaged 12.5 months). In locking plate group,the operative time was (87±14) minutes;blood loss was (367±213) ml;drainage was (63±14) ml;healing time was(11.9±3.4) weeks;7 patients had complications;and the Harriss score was(85±6). While in DHS group,the operative time was(115±23) minutes;blood loss was(582±243) ml;drainage was (98±16) ml;healing time was (12.4±2.5) weeks;9 patients had complications;and the Harriss score was(84±8). There were no significant differences in the healing time,complications and Harris scores between two groups (P>0.05),but there were significant differences in the operative time,blood loss,drainage between two groups(P<0.05). Comparing with DHS group,the locking plate group was of shorter operative time,fewer blood loss and drainage.

Conclusion: Proximal femoral locking plate is simple,minimally invasive,stable fixation with fewer complications,and is an effective method for intertrochanteric hip fractures.
KEY WORDS  Femoral fractures  Fracture fixation,internal  Case-control studies
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:罗湘平,何顺清,李治安.锁定钢板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床对照试验[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(3):242~244
英文格式:LUO Xiang-ping,HE Shun-qing,LI Zhi-an.Case-control studies on locking plates and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2011,24(3):242~244
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号