| 不同固定方法治疗股骨转子间骨折的病例对照研究 |
|
摘要点击次数: 2503
全文下载次数: 1383
投稿时间：2010-04-25
|
| 作者 | Author | 单位 | Address | E-Mail |
| 王德伟 |
WANG De-wei |
哈尔滨市骨伤医院骨一病区, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080 |
Department of the First Orthopaedics, the Hospital of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Harbin, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, China |
WDW19761224@163.com |
| 苏恩亮 |
SU En-liang |
哈尔滨市骨伤医院骨一病区, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080 |
Department of the First Orthopaedics, the Hospital of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Harbin, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, China |
|
| 王文君 |
WANG Wen-jun |
哈尔滨市骨伤医院骨一病区, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080 |
Department of the First Orthopaedics, the Hospital of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Harbin, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, China |
|
| 王顺 |
WANG Shun |
哈尔滨市骨伤医院骨一病区, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080 |
Department of the First Orthopaedics, the Hospital of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Harbin, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, China |
|
| 王博峰 |
WANG Bo-feng |
哈尔滨市骨伤医院骨一病区, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080 |
Department of the First Orthopaedics, the Hospital of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Harbin, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, China |
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2010年，第23卷，第10期，第769-771页 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2010.10.016 |
| 基金项目: |
|
中文摘要:
目的：比较不同固定方法治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效，并做理论性分析。
方法：自2003年6月至2007年6月采用Richard钉、PFN及外固定架治疗321例(男132例，女189例；年龄20～93岁，平均56.8岁)股骨转子间骨折患者，其中PFN组94例，Richard钉组142例，外固定架组85例。采用回顾性分析方法，内容包括并发症发生率及髋关节功能(采用Kudema改良Merli D'Aubigne标准从疼痛、运动幅度、步行等方面进行比较),并作统计学分析。
结果：所有患者均获随访，时间10个月至4年，平均14个月。并发症发生率：外固定架组与其他两组之间存在统计学差异(P<0.05),而Richard钉组与PFN组之间无统计学差异(P>0.05).髋关节功能：3组有统计学差异(P<0.05).
结论：3组固定方法比较，PFN的疗效最佳，并发症发生率较低，为目前治疗转子间骨折疗效较好的治疗方法。 |
| 【关键词】髋骨折 股骨 骨折固定术 并发症 病例对照研究 |
| |
| Case control study of different fixing methods for intertrochanteric fractures |
|
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of different fixing methods for intertrochanteric fractures and make theoretical analysis.
Methods: From June 2003 to June 2007,321 patients with intertrochanteric fractures,male 132 and female 189,ranging in age from 20 to 93 years with an average of 56.8 years,were treated with different fixation including Richard nail(142 cases),proximal femora nail(PFN,94 cases)and external fixator(85 cases). The clinical data of all the patients were retrospectively analyzed,including the incidence of compications,joint function of hip(according Kudema modified Merli D'Aubigne criteria).
Results: All patients were followed up from 10 months to 4 years with an average of 14 months.About the incidence of complications,there was significant difference between the external fixator group and the others two groups (P<0.05);there was no significant difference between the Richard nail group and the PFN group (P>0.05). There was significant difference in joint function of hip among three methods. PEN group was best than others two groups.
Conclusion: There is the best clinical effects and lowest incidence of complications with PFN method,which is the better choice in treating intertrochanteric fractures. |
| KEY WORDS Hip fractures Femur Fracture fixation Complications Case-control studies |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 王德伟,苏恩亮,王文君,王顺,王博峰.不同固定方法治疗股骨转子间骨折的病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(10):769~771 |
| 英文格式: | WANG De-wei,SU En-liang,WANG Wen-jun,WANG Shun,WANG Bo-feng.Case control study of different fixing methods for intertrochanteric fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2010,23(10):769~771 |
|
| 阅读全文 下载 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
