跟骨关节内骨折不同内固定方式疗效比较
摘要点击次数: 2175   全文下载次数: 1387   投稿时间:2006-04-05    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
牛锋 NIU Feng, 扬州市中医院骨科, 江苏扬州225009 Department of Orthopaedics,the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Yangzhou,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China niufeng19972005@126.com 
傅强 FU Qiang 扬州市中医院骨科, 江苏扬州225009 Department of Orthopaedics,the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Yangzhou,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China  
王明喜 WANG Ming-xi 山东省中医院骨科 Department of Orthopaedics,the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Yangzhou,Yangzhou 225009,Jiangsu,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2007年,第20卷,第2期,第77-79页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:总结跟骨关节内骨折的治疗经验,探讨切开复位内固定方式的选择及植骨方法。

方法:跟骨关节内骨折82例94足,男50例57足,女32例37足,其中双足跟骨骨折12例。根据CT采用Sanders分类法,SandersⅠ型8足,Ⅱ型34足,Ⅲ型36足,Ⅳ型16足。其中Ⅱ型:钢针固定组16足,其中植骨组9足,未植骨组7足;钢板固定组12足,其中植骨组8足,未植骨组4足;撬拨复位6足。Ⅲ型:钢针固定组12足,其中植骨组8足,未植骨组4足;钢板固定组17足,其中植骨组11足,未植骨组6足;撬拨复位7足。采用Maryland足部评分系统评分。

结果:随访时间1-28个月,平均11.5个月,SandersⅡ型与Ⅲ型切开复位内固定方式的治疗结果比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);植骨组和未植骨组的治疗结果比较有统计学差异(SandersⅡ型P<0.05,SandersⅢ型P<0.01)。

结论:SandersⅡ型与Ⅲ型跟骨骨折切开复位内固定时应尽量选用钢针内固定并应植骨,若跟骨碎成多块,可选用钢板固定。
【关键词】跟骨  骨折  骨折固定术,内  骨移植
 
Therapeutic effect comparison of different internal fixation on calcaneus intra-articular fractures
ABSTRACT  

Objective:To conclude the experience of diagnosis and treatment of calcaneus fracture,discuss the necessity of the choice of the style of open reduction and internal fixtion,bone grafting.

Methods:Ninety-four calcaneal fractures in 82 cases included 57 calcaneus of 50 male and 37 calcaneus of 32 female,12 cases were both calcaneus fractures.According to Sanders classification,there were 8 calcaneal fractures of type Ⅰ,34 of type Ⅱ,36 of type Ⅲ and 16 of type Ⅳ.Among the 34 calcaneal freactures of type Ⅱ,16 were treated by Kirschner′s wires(bone grafting in 9 and without bone grafting in 7);12 were treated by plate(bone grafting in 8 and without bone grafting in 4);6 were treated percutaneous reduction by leverage.Among the 36 calcaneal freactures of type Ⅲ,12 were treated by Kirschner′s wires(grafting in 8 and without grafting in 4);17 were treated by plate(grafting in 11 and without grafting in 6);7 were treated percutaneous reduction by leverage.The joint function were evaluated according to Maryland foot score system before and after operation with or without bone grafting.

Results: All were followed up for 1 to 28 months,11.5 months on average.There was no difference between type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ fixed by plate or Kirschner′s wires in open reduction(P>0.05);there was a clear statistically significant superiority between with bone grafting and without bone grafting in type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ(Sanders Ⅱ P<0.05,Sanders Ⅲ P<0.01).

Conclusion:During open reduction and internal fixation patients of type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ fractures should be treated by Kirschner′s wires and bone grafting,fracture with melti-segment could be select.
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:牛锋,傅强,王明喜.跟骨关节内骨折不同内固定方式疗效比较[J].中国骨伤,2007,20(2):77~79
英文格式:NIU Feng,,FU Qiang,WANG Ming-xi.Therapeutic effect comparison of different internal fixation on calcaneus intra-articular fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2007,20(2):77~79
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号