桡骨远端骨折的个体化治疗及其临床意义
摘要点击次数: 2019   全文下载次数: 1769   投稿时间:2005-05-08    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
闫合德 YAN He-de 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China yanhede@hotmai.lcom 
高伟阳 GAO Wei-yang 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China  
李志杰 LI Zhi-jie 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China  
洪建军 HONG Jian-jun 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China  
历智 LI zhi 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China  
陈星隆 CHEN Xing-long 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China  
李晓阳 LI Xiao-yang 温州医学院附属第二医院骨显微外科,浙江温州325000 Department of Microsurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325000,Zhejiang,China  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》2006年,第19卷,第4期,第211-213页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz
基金项目:
中文摘要:

目的:观察不同治疗方法对不同类型桡骨远端骨折的临床治疗效果,探讨个体化治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床意义。

方法:收集我院在1999年6月-2003年1月收治的198例桡骨远端骨折患者的临床资料,按Cooney桡骨远端骨折的国际分类系统分型,分为Ⅰ~Ⅵ型,各型骨折随机分为保守治疗组和手术治疗组,随访观察两组各型骨折的临床疗效。193例分别获得4~38个月随访(平均9个月)。采用改良Gartland and Werley(GW)评分系统对腕部进行功能评估。根据主、客观标准分为不同的功能等级:0~2分为优,3~8分为良,9~14分为中,≥15分为差。

结果:手术治疗组优37例,良39例,中21例,差2例。保守治疗组优29例,良44例,中13例,差8例。Ⅰ、Ⅲ型骨折手术治疗组要比保守治疗组的GW评分要高,但二者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ⅱ、Ⅵ型骨折手术治疗组的GW评分要明显低于保守治疗组,二者差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论:桡骨远端骨折的治疗要根据不同骨折类型采用不同治疗方法,才能获得良好的临床疗效。个体化治疗桡骨远端骨折具有重要的临床意义。
【关键词】桡骨骨折  个体化治疗  临床方案
 
Individual treatment and its clinical significance in the management of distal radial fractures
ABSTRACT  

Objective:To evaluate the clinical results of distal radial fractures with conservative methods and open techniques respectively,and study the clinical values of individual management to the distal radial fractures.

Methods:From June 1999 to January 2003,198 patients’ clinical data with distal radial fractures were analyzed.The fractures were classified into six types according to the Cooney international classification.All patients were randomly treated with conservative methods and open techniques.They were followed up form 4 to 38 months with an average of 9 months.The functional evaluation depended on the modified Gartland and Werley’s(GW) scoring system,0-2 score was excellent,3-8 good,9-14 fair,more than 15 poor.

Results:In the surgical group,37 cases obtained excellent,39 good,21 fair,2 poor,In the conservative group,29 cases obtained excellent,44 good,13 fair and 8 poor.The scores of Type Ⅰ and Ⅲ fracture in the surgical group were higher than that of the conservative group,but there were no significant difference(P>0.05).The scores of type Ⅱ and Ⅳ fracture in the surgical group were lower than that of the conservative group,moreover,there were significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion:Different types of the distal radial fracture should be treated with different methods,and individual management have important clinical value in the treatment of the distal radial fractures.
KEY WORDS  Radial fractures  Individual treatment  Clinical protocols
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:闫合德,高伟阳,李志杰,洪建军,历智,陈星隆,李晓阳.桡骨远端骨折的个体化治疗及其临床意义[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(4):211~213
英文格式:YAN He-de,GAO Wei-yang,LI Zhi-jie,HONG Jian-jun,LI zhi,CHEN Xing-long,LI Xiao-yang.Individual treatment and its clinical significance in the management of distal radial fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2006,19(4):211~213
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号