| 股骨颈骨折两种治疗方法的比较 |
|
摘要点击次数: 1849
全文下载次数: 1132
投稿时间：2002-05-09
|
|
|
| 期刊信息：《中国骨伤》2003年，第16卷，第5期，第257-259页 |
| DOI：doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz |
| 基金项目: |
|
中文摘要:
目的:探讨闭合复位内固定与切开复位内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效、各自优缺点及最佳适应症。
方法:将98例股骨颈骨折患者随机分为两组,分别采用闭合复位内固定术及切开复位内固定术治疗。其中闭合复位组56例,切开复位组42例。
结果: 经1～5年,平均26年的随访。闭合复位组:治愈33例,好转20例,未愈3例;切开复位组:治愈21例,好转19例,未愈2例。两种治疗方法临床效果无统计学差别(P>0.05)。
结论:对能闭合复位满意的新鲜股骨颈骨折,闭合复位内固定应视为有效、可靠的首选方法。 |
| 【关键词】股骨颈骨折 手法,骨科 骨折固定术,内 |
| |
| Comparison of two methods for the treament of femoral neck fractures |
|
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect and the indications for the treatment of the femoral neck fractures with closed and open reduction fixation
Methods:98 patients with femoral neck fractures were divided into two groups randomly,56 cases with closed reduction and internal fixation and 42 cases with open group,with respective adoption of the treatment of internal fixations of closed and open reduction and internal fixation.
Results:After 1 to 5 years follow up (average 2 6 years),33 are cured,20 improved and 3 uncured in closed group.21 are cured,19 improved and 2 uncured in open group.There is no significant differences between the two Methods(P>0.05).
Conclusion:The closed reduction should be selected firstly for the treatment for fresh femoral neck fractures.The combined internal fixation and muscle pedicle bone grafts should be used for the treatment of old femoral neck fractures with communicated fragments or posterior defects and unsatisfied closed reduction. |
| KEY WORDS Femoral neck fractures Manipulation,orthopaedic Fracture fixation,internal |
| |
| 引用本文，请按以下格式著录参考文献： |
| 中文格式: | 刘子山,刘旭光,龚洪国,王永善,范文.股骨颈骨折两种治疗方法的比较[J].中国骨伤,2003,16(5):257~259 |
| 英文格式: | LIU Zishan,LIU Xuguang,GONG Hongguo.Comparison of two methods for the treament of femoral neck fractures[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,2003,16(5):257~259 |
|
| 阅读全文 下载 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
