二种髌骨骨折内固定术比较
摘要点击次数: 2049   全文下载次数: 1094   投稿时间:1994-03-30    
作者Author单位AddressE-Mail
蔡桦 Cai Hua 广州中医学院附属骨伤科医院  
詹杰辉 Zhan Jie-hui 广州中医学院附属骨伤科医院  
期刊信息:《中国骨伤》1995年,第8卷,第2期,第12-13页
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz
基金项目:
中文摘要:53例髌骨骨折患者分别接受粗丝线环扎内固定术(39例)和张力带钢丝内固定术(14例)治疗。术后三个月疗效对比显示,环扎组优良率高于张力带组;张力带组因术后克氏针尾触痛。活动功能的恢复反而普遍慢于环扎组。作者认为,对髌骨骨折在选择切开复位内固定时,粗丝线环扎术应为首选。
【关键词】髌骨骨折  骨折内固定术  临床研究
 
A comparison between two kinds of internal fixation in treating fracture of patella
ABSTRACT  Affiliated Hospital of Orthopaedics, Guangzhou College of TCM (510240) Fifty-three cases of fracture of patella were treated with coarse silk thread cerclage internal fixation in 39 cases, and tension steel wire internal fixation in 14 cases. Three months postoperatively showed that the former was superior than the later. It is because in later group tail of the Kirschner pin brought a touching pain postoperatively, so recovery of the function was generally slower than the former group. It is suggested that in the treatment of fracture of patellar the former method was first choice.
KEY WORDS  Fracture of patellar  Internal  fixation  fracture  Clinical  study
 
引用本文,请按以下格式著录参考文献:
中文格式:蔡桦,詹杰辉.二种髌骨骨折内固定术比较[J].中国骨伤,1995,8(2):12~13
英文格式:Cai Hua,Zhan Jie-hui.A comparison between two kinds of internal fixation in treating fracture of patella[J].zhongguo gu shang / China J Orthop Trauma ,1995,8(2):12~13
阅读全文  下载  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭




版权所有:《中国骨伤》杂志社京ICP备12048066号-2  版权声明
地址:北京市东直门内南小街甲16号,100700
电话:010-64089487 传真:010-64089792 Email:zggszz@sina.com

京公网安备 11010102004237号